Mock-up of the proposed Hillsdale Municipal Airport terminal. Jason Walters | Courtesy

A set of concept designs shared exclusively with The Collegian showcase plans for a $3 to $8 million expansion for the Hillsdale Municipal Airport, including the additions of a restaurant, museum, and pilot shop.

“We want to get together some sponsors, donors, and aviation enthusiasts to help build and incorporate an educational element into this terminal,” Airport Manager Jason Walters said.”This is all an initiative to develop and design a terminal that is self-sufficient so it can be a lifetime building.”

Mock-up of the proposed Hillsdale Municipal Airport terminal. Jason Walters | Courtesy

The Hillsdale Municipal Airport is managed by Walters and his company Patriot Aviation, a relatively small organization, with five full and part-time employees. Despite only serving 1,000 to 1,500 landings and takeoffs a year, Walters said he is optimistic that he can fund the ambitious airport project with the help of sponsors to avoid dipping into public funds.

“The taxpayer dollars that go to this will be used strictly for service management and grant insurance compliance,” Walters said. “This is an out-of-the-box initiative to find a way to eliminate the burden on the taxpayers.”

Since becoming the airport manager last year, Walters said he has lead a series of improvements at the airport, including the renovation and remodeling of the existing terminal and securing $800,000 in funds from Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder to replace the existing parking area for aircraft. By hosting a Fly-In on September 11 for military helicopters and World War II-era planes, Walters helped to promote the airport’s presence in Hillsdale.

The overall floor plan of the expansion concept. Jason Walters | Courtesy

“These improvements will allow the airport to be better used to promote new business opportunities by improving transportation options,” City Manager David Mackie said. “Additionally, we’re hoping these improvements will entice others, who use the airport, to participate in the city’s plans to privately develop and maintain a new multi-use terminal.”

Most recently, the airport acquired a Cessna Skyhawk plane to use for flying lessons, costing $130 to $150 an hour.

But Walters said he wants to do more. While the addition of a restaurant and a museum to a rural airport may seem unusual, Walters said it will promote aviation in the community.

“Almost anyone that lives and breathes aviation will tell you the same thing. Promoting aviation involves promoting all aspects of it,” Walters said. “You inspire young, future pilots by getting them active and involved. It’s a Fly-In with Army, Black Hawk helicopters and a Chinook troop transport that is impressionable to that young child. When you look at museums, it’s all connected to that.”

First floor design plan including a restaurant and pilot shop. Jason Walters | Courtesy

The tentative plan according to Walters’ concept designs is to house two vintage planes in a spare hangar, one military plane and one transport or passenger plane.

“The museum will provide proof to the average person that aviation is right there and it’s achievable,” Walters said. “It will inspire, educate, and entertain. The appreciation for aviation grows when you have static displays to ponder and discuss.”

In addition to the museum, Walters said that the construction of a restaurant will not only be an appeal for more pilots to visit the airport, but  that it will also bring people from the community to experience aviation.

“The concept for the restaurant is to put in a small diner-style restaurant in the terminal, which is popular for many other terminals,” Walters said. “Not only does it provide a reason for people to fly in, but it also gets people in the community involved so that they can see planes take off and land as they are eating.”

Walters said interested restaurant owners would be able to lease out the space, and all the serving and cooking equipment would be provided for their use. While Walters said the overall vision has received acclaim from city officials and local business owners, some residents are cautious.

Jeff King — a pilot and founder and former member of the Airport Advisory Committee to the Hillsdale City Council — said the vision for the terminal is impressive, but safety concerns should be foremost.

“I feel it’s a good vision and I’m glad that they have private sponsors to fund it, but I have ongoing concerns that the city cannot afford to properly maintain the airport,” King said. “As a pilot, what matters most to me is safety and usefulness of an airport.”

Constructing the whole vision as seen in the concept drawings would be great, Walters said, but he wants to prioritize the right aspects of the airport.

“Even if we don’t raise enough to build all of it, we intend to raise enough to build a terminal and educational components,” Walters said. “We would take away things that wouldn’t generate revenue or be a good return on investment.”

Previous articleEsolen’s new book hopes to raise American culture ‘Out of the Ashes’
Next articleLopez talks love and law
Thomas Novelly
Collegian Editor-in-Chief, Thomas Novelly was born in Novi, Michigan, but was raised in Franklin, Tennessee, making him a self-proclaimed "Yankee gone South." Thomas began writing for The Collegian as a sophomore, and since has served as a reporter, columnist, and Assistant City News Editor. He has also worked for two major publications, interning at the Washington Free Beacon in D.C. and The Tennessean in Nashville. His work has been seen in National publications such as CBS News, National Review Online, Stars And Stripes, and USA Today. Follow him on Twitter @TomNovelly.
  • Tyler Groenendal

    How, exactly, will this promote “new business opportunities”?

    • Ellsworth_Toohey

      Build it and they will come Tyler. Build it and they will come. Build it and they will come.

      • Tyler Groenendal

        – Hillsdale City Government, re: The Dawn Theater, Keefer House

        • Stephen French

          Because status quo was working so well with those properties

          • disqus_odKVC5cL1k

            Actually it was. They brought in 4k in taxes a year, from a real cash value of 200k combined. Paying 100% premium for a failed business and a hotel that needs $3M+ just to open, perhaps getting customers 4-6 weekends a year, TIFA can’t turn a profit on that, and the city just lost $4k a year.

          • Stephen French

            That’s exactly the problem. To accept the premise that the building will remain vacant and only provide $4k in annual property taxes is the issue. In addition, the hotel study will tell TIFA and future investors if a hotel would be profitable at that location…if not, then the city can market the properties to other types of investment opportunities. TIFA was never intended to be the managing entity of a hotel or any other business at that location…only a conduit to peak redevelopment interest in the properties.

          • disqus_odKVC5cL1k

            Ok, let’s recap.

            The underground gets help, and closes, folks out of work, and any revenue other than property tax associated there is also gone now. The underground being a more recently renovated space, although smaller than the dawn, but don’t have accurate capacity for either, just seemed that way.

            Dawn, hadn’t really been open in years. No buyers on the horizon while in private hands, needs a heavy reno, and bought at 100% over market value. So, TIFA has a line of buyers clamoring to buy it and pay 200k+ for it, then put another 500k in at least to bring it up to a reasonable standard for performances or movies? Somebody did check what a commercial projector costs right? I’m guessing no, because the building would be worth less than the projector, and sound system. Think Pinto with a 2k radio, amps, and speakers in it, that’s how outlandish that idea is.

            Keefer, where to start. Another 100k building needing 3M in reno work. Can’t say I saw one thing happen there in all the years in town. Not to say something didn’t happen there, just never heard or saw it. Competing with Days Inn, who basically sets the price for non-peak days, You’re getting $70 a night, lets be generous, make it $100 a night. To make back 3M, at 100 a night, that’s 30k room nights at 100% profit, but average hotel margins are 6%, so that 30k room night break even is really 500k. Now how long is that in real days. Well, I’m going to be lazy and say there are 50 rooms, down to 10k nights at 100% occupancy. That’s 27 years full 100% every night. With no reno costs in that time. I’m not an economist, but I can see there is no way to make money on that project. But let’s keep going and host a wedding or major event every weekend, better yet lets double up 2 a weekend, and charge 20k an event (who in town can afford that every weekend, I don’t know TIFA?) At an improved margin of 10%, that brings in an additional 210k, cutting our payback time down to only 10 years, so much better chance of getting someone on the hook for that deal than the 27 year one.

            Come on, how can anyone take this situation seriously? Recap, 2 defunct event venues one of which needs a lot of work, another just closed. Hotel that under insanely optimistic projections breaks even in 10 years. The city is going to see that 400k back when?

          • Stephen French

            I think your renovation expenses and estimates are laughable. Anyway, at least the city is attempting to rehab those properties instead of watching them rot into themselves

          • disqus_odKVC5cL1k

            42 Union, 8 apartments, $785k grant for a building far newer and with semi-modern construction already. Sad you didn’t do your homework before buying the two. Hotel renovation costs are fairly easy to find, Dow center needed $35k a room, without needing to update the building itself, remove asbestos, new well everything. Just at 35k, 50 rooms, 1.75M, how far off is that 3M number now? Common areas, ballrooms, elevators, all the service infrastructure that doesn’t exist, communications, entertainment infrastructure, commercial kitchen. I may have underestimated at 3M.

            So the city is better at renovation than private businesses? I have to believe that if Broad Street could have made it work, they would have, but even the modest budget they used on the remodel look where it ended up. Now the city wants to try too? I guess when it’s monopoly money, spend away. I know the next 4100 potholes I find will be named Dawn and Keefer.

          • Ellsworth_Toohey

            Looks like you are scaring them away with logic and common sense. Too bad they are scaring off business growth.

          • Tyler Groenendal

            Game, set, match. Excellently said on all counts.

          • Ellsworth_Toohey

            You do realize a legitimate private sector business would have completed the ‘hotel study’ before the check was signed?


  • I’m not so sure about the restaurant or museum aspects… I don’t see the demand or draw existing for either one. But the pilot shop is a good idea, and we definitely need terminal facilities, because what we’ve got now ain’t cuttin’ it. The fact that this would be funded privately apart from the regular operation and functions of the airport is also a big plus. We need far more of that here in Hillsdale. And I LOVE the art deco design. I just love art deco in general, especially surrounding aviation and transportation.

  • disqus_odKVC5cL1k

    Totally missing the value of an air museum. Kzoo Air Zoo 90 minutes away. This will be an ongoing liability, not an asset. Nobody, and I mean nobody would come here to look at 2 planes of generic background. No way you would get 2 significant planes put in there. Is it a nice 2 minute time killer for passengers waiting either for a flight plan to get filed or while filling up the plane, sure, but the costs associated don’t justify it.

    • Ellsworth_Toohey

      My exact thought after thinking about it. Also the placement of the Museum hangar is a total waste…. even at the air zoo they don’t take up primary apron space with a museum hangar. Federally funded concrete is expensive.

      Having people who have an actual background in aviation involved in this project would be helpful….. just saying.

  • Ellsworth_Toohey

    If you’re looking for actual input from the pilot community, the covered walkway is a massive waste of apron space. Instead just extend the awning from the terminal building. That is how most terminals do it that offer that feature.

    I like the Art Deco Look.

    The large museum aircraft, just park them on the grass next to the hangar. Hangar space is too valuable to waste.

    Restaurant…. it’s not going to work with only 4 tables. Instead convert the existing terminal to a restaurant.

    • disqus_odKVC5cL1k

      Seen a covered apron before, look up KEDC, but the entire AC fits under and pulls through. As shown, someone forgot planes don’t have a great reverse, and the roof is not nearly wide enough to get wingtips towards the center, so half the plane is under.

      As for the food, that had better be 5 star food, or killer BBQ, remembering that operating costs are part of the meal cost, flying from just 30 minutes away, that’s a $150+ meal before you even sit down to eat. With in town places folding fairly regularly, novelty only gets you there once.

      • Ellsworth_Toohey

        Like at bottom?

        They have one like that in Gary Indiana also.

        I was thinking more of a overhang with some I-beams to support it. Not going to keep the entire plane dry, but if taxi with the passenger door facing the terminal it would minimize things.

        I looked at the scale, and if it’s accurate, there are some serious scaling issues in the drawing. The lunch counter is about 1 foot wide. The DC-3 looking twin engine airplanes have 34 foot wingspans and the hangar’s are 50 x 50

        • disqus_odKVC5cL1k

          That’s KEDC in the we’re open picture. For scale, a G5 fits in about 3/4 the width.

          In the plans shown, the overhang is about 20 feet tops. For scale, a Cessna 172 would need about 20 feet to get one side door under the shelter, to still be able to pull out, without needing a pushback.

      • Ellsworth_Toohey

        I haven’t quite found what I am looking for, but more like this below. It helps the architecture if it blends into the building. That way the aircraft can approach it from either direction to discharge passengers and no tug is needed to back it away from the structure.

      • Mike Connor

        So it’s a $150 hour to operate. You already no that since you must be a plane owner. If you could not afford that you would probably sell you plane. They are trying to make something nice and it appears to me these are just preliminary drawings that are subject to change. Instead of bashing them wait and see how it turns out. Maybe it will be a regular stop someday.

        • disqus_odKVC5cL1k

          In the long list of things the city needs:
          New firetruck
          Fully staffed police and fire departments
          Sewer plant backup generators
          Generators at Baw Beese back in workable condition
          Roads repaved
          Blight property removed
          Empty industrial buildings/capacity filled
          Internet access speeds improved
          Roads repaved again
          Selling Dawn and Keefer
          Building a diner at the airport

          It’s pretty far down the priority list for anyone but a very small number of people. The good thing is it is private money, but that will most certainly turn into a grant request, so it looks like private money, but the locals end up paying for it in the end.

          • Ellsworth_Toohey

            It’s not all private money. It starts with the $800K from the state of Michigan and whatever else the city needs to match for the 2nd apron.

            And heavy duty grant requests have already been discussed for this project, just not brought out in the article.

            The rest you are spot on about.

  • One criticism I would add about the aesthetics of the design, and I thought about this the more I looked at the pictures: the “Hillsdale Municipal Airport” sign needs to be changed. Having it broken up on the horizontal axis so that “Municipal” sits out on the awning while “Hillsdale” and “Airport” sit back against the building looks ridiculous. Instead, “Hillsdale Municipal Airport” should be lettered across the front of the awning in black aluminum with shaped LED backlighting simulating neon, a la this classic art deco signage.

    • Ellsworth_Toohey

      I like it.

      But of course you are under the presumption the city is listening to the citizens or input from users of the airport. Not even the cities own airport advisory committee saw these drawings in their entirety before they were released to the Collegian.